RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Locally advanced, inoperable, or metastatic gallbladder cancers (GBC) are treated with either gemcitabine-platinum combinations or gemcitabine alone based on physician discretion. However, the combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel (GCNP) has shown increased response rates and prolonged survival in a phase II trial of biliary tract patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive series of patients diagnosed with locally advanced (liver infiltration > 5 cm, large nodes at porta, abutting duodenum), inoperable, and metastatic biliary tract patients between January 2018 and August 2022 were evaluated for first-line chemotherapy GCNP, in the multidisciplinary joint clinic (MDJC). The primary endpoint was ORR, and the major secondary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). RESULTS: A total of 142 patients received GCNP during the specified time period. The median age of the cohort was 52 years (range: 21-79), the majority were females (61.3%), and the majority were GB (81.7%). Response rates were available in 137 patients. Complete response, partial response, and stable disease were seen in 9 (6.3%), 87 (61.3%), and 24 (16.9%), respectively, for an ORR of 67.6% and a clinical benefit rate of 84.5%. The median EFS was 9.92 (95% CI, 7.69-12.14) months. Of the 52 patients in whom GCNP was given with NACT intent for locally advanced GBC, 17 patients underwent surgery (34%). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that GCNP leads to improved response rates, increased chances of resectability, and possibly better survival in patients with GBC.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Chemoradiation therapy (CRT) remains the treatment of choice for inoperable locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC). Several CRT regimens are existent in esophageal cancer, but definitive conclusions are lacking. We performed a pilot study to compare treatment outcome, survival, and toxicities in inoperable upper and middle third esophageal cancer patients undergoing CRT using either paclitaxel/carboplatin or cisplatin/5FU based regimen. Methods: Patients were randomised in two arms (arm A and arm B). In Arm A, taxane-based (Paclitaxel+carboplatin) and in arm B non-taxane-based (cisplatin+5FU) doublet chemotherapy drugs were given concurrently with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). EBRT in two phases up to a total dose of 54 Gy/27#@2Gy/# was given. Response was subsequently assessed using Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST v1.1) and toxicities utilizing Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v 4.0). Result: The overall response rate (ORR) in the taxane-based group was higher than the non-taxane-based group, but was not significantly different (p=0.851). Regarding hematological toxicities, anaemia and reduced cell counts were more in the taxane group compared to the non-taxane group while non-hematological toxicities were comparable. Similarly, better survival with late toxicities were seen with taxane-based arm when compared to non-taxane-based arm, though it was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Our pilot analysis highlights the fact that paclitaxel/carboplatin CRT shows better response, survival, and comparable toxicities when compared to cisplatin/5FU, though statistically nonsignificant. Further randomised prospective trials with large sample size are warranted.
